Analysis of Revenue Recognition and Contract Cost Recognition under PSAK 72: Evidence from PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of revenue recognition and construction contract cost recognition under PSAK 72 at PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk, one of Indonesia’s largest state-owned construction companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The research evaluates whether the company’s accounting practices comply with the principles of PSAK 72 concerning revenue from contracts with customers, particularly in relation to performance obligations and the matching of contract costs with recognized revenue. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed using secondary data collected from annual reports, audited financial statements, and relevant academic literature. Data were analyzed through document analysis by comparing the company’s accounting policies with the recognition and measurement requirements stipulated in PSAK 72. The findings indicate that the adoption of PSAK 72 has not significantly altered revenue recognition practices for the company’s core construction projects, as revenue continues to be recognized over time using the cost-to-cost percentage-of-completion method, which is consistent with the standard. However, challenges remain in recognizing and classifying construction contract costs, particularly regarding the presentation of contract assets and inventories, indicating potential inconsistencies in applying the matching principle. These findings suggest that formal compliance with PSAK 72 in revenue recognition does not necessarily ensure equivalent compliance in contract cost recognition. This study contributes to the accounting literature by providing empirical evidence on PSAK 72 implementation in Indonesia’s construction industry and highlights the importance of strengthening internal controls, cost estimation procedures, and financial reporting quality to improve transparency and decision-making.
Article Details
Section
References
Adella, M., Dewi, N. S., & Ahalik. (2021). Analisis penerapan pengakuan pendapatan PSAK 72 dan dampak terhadap pajak penghasilan final dan manajemen laba pada perusahaan konstruksi yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2019. Journal of Management and Business Review, 18(3), 582–598.
Ayu, N. A. K., & Mariadi, Y. (2024). Analisis pengakuan pendapatan dan pembebanan biaya kontrak konstruksi menurut PSAK No. 72 pada perusahaan jasa konstruksi (Studi pada CV Wanamartha Anugerah Samawa). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Humaniora, 10(4), 775–781.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2018). Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) 72:
Pendapatan dari Kontrak dengan Pelanggan. Jakarta: Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2020). Intermediate Accounting (IFRS Edition). John Wiley & Sons.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-2). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Veronica, L., Lestari, U. P., & Metekohy, E. Y. (2019). Analisis dampak penerapan pengakuan pendapatan berdasarkan PSAK 72 terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan real estate di Indonesia yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar (IRWNS).
Wisnantiasri, S. N. (2018). Pengaruh PSAK 72: Pendapatan dari kontrak dengan pelanggan terhadap shareholder value pada perusahaan sektor property, real estate, and building construction. Widyakala, 5(1).
Yulistini, D., Kanika, K. E., Ramadhan, M. F., & Meidiyustiani, R. (2024). Dampak penerapan PSAK 72 terhadap pengakuan pendapatan di sektor konstruksi: Studi tinjauan literatur. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Ekonomi, 2(4), 456–471.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2017). PSAK 72: Pendapatan dari Kontrak dengan Pelanggan. Jakarta: DSAK IAI.
Imanuddin, H., Yunita, A., & Sumiyati. (2023). Analisis Komparasi Kinerja Keuangan Sebelum dan Sesudah Penerapan PSAK 72 pada Perusahaan Infrastruktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Accounting Journal of Ibrahimy.
Haliding, S., Alfiani, A., Majid, J., Badollahi, I., & Marsuni, N. S. (2025). Digitalization and Strategic Development in Enhancing Islamic Pawnshop Products for Financial Inclusion. INVOICE: JURNAL ILMU AKUNTANSI, 7(1), 37-45.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2023). Intermediate Accounting (18th ed.). Wiley.
PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk. (2024). Annual Report 2024.
Scott, W. R. (2015). Financial Accounting Theory (7th ed.). Pearson.
Van Wyk, M., & Coetsee, D. (2020). The Adequacy of IFRS 15 for Revenue Recognition in the Construction Industry. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences.
Yulistini, D., Kanika, K. E., Ramadhan, M. F., & Meidiyustiani, R. (2024). Dampak Penerapan PSAK 72 terhadap Pengakuan Pendapatan di Sektor Konstruksi: Studi Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Ekonomi.